![]() X50, while having awful keys, wins in the sound department, those extra 32MB are very much audible in choice, both in preset and potentially user programs. ![]() Triton classic, with all the advantages mentioned, always seemed to me too oldish and therefore a bit obscure. ![]() I had both of them, not at the same time though. ![]() My question would be: What is the impact on the timbrality has to be expected in the both cases? So, is it worth changing from the Korg X50 to the Triton Classic while neglecting the absence of both the Sampler and the Sequencer in the Korg X50 just on the reason of timbrality? While the X50 has a simplified schematics with 2 DAC single boards / plates with filters only, so I also cannot see any possible 1&2 + 3&4 voices or registers at all. The Triton has 3 DAC boards / plates with filters (1 single & 1 double plated) along with possibly 1&2 + 3&4 voices or registers, as I might think (blue colored) What I can see is the impressive schematics on the part of Triton and the less impressive schematics as conveyed by X50. I'm looking for someone who has experience with the both but preferable who has more knowledge concerning the circuitry available. Please help me either to get rid of an Idée fixe or to meet a proper choice between my own Korg X50 and the idea of the eventual Triton Classic 64 Mb + SCSI Drive I am being offered now.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |